But not all see it the same way.
Some say, "The cow isn't even pink. It's red. And why would anyone make a cow red? Cows definitely aren't red. When was the last time you saw a red cow?
While others reflect, "I think Mr. Warhol's clashing colors present a deeper, underlying thought. The cow is clearly the subject of the piece as it is the darker color against the brighter yellow background. The sharp division in the pink and yellow illustrate the debated issue of animal rights."
Another perspective says, "This is pretty awesome. I like the vibrant colors and the random cow. It's even kinda comic-bookie. Andy Warhol was a cool guy."
A few others:
"I like the colors, but the cow doesn't fit."
"I like the cow, but the colors don't fit."
"What was this guy thinking?"
The last question seems to remain true in all of the perspectives: What was Andy Warhol thinking? We don't really know for sure, but he took a cow and made it "WOW" (I know, I'm so funny). This ignorance is present in all of these views, but it also makes each point of view question more.
Why did Warhol choose a cow as his main attraction? Was he actually trying to prove a point? Was he just trying to be funny? Personally, I think Warhol chose the cow for a number of reasons. Warhol's art revolved around American culture with subjects such as a Campbell's tomato soup can and Marilyn Monroe. The cow represents America's acres of farms and dependence on agriculture. Cows are also simple and, well, random.
What if Andy chose different colors? What if he didn't change the original color of the cow at all? What if he added a few more colors to the spectrum? The colors of a work of art lend great meaning and understanding. In any situation, a different palette would change the outlook entirely. Whether outrageous or conservative, the colors shape the perspective of the beholder.
No comments:
Post a Comment